On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 7:38 AM, Thomas <iacobellisthomas_at_yahoo.com> wrote:
After speaking with Abram,I've cleared up a few points that were misleading
and/or left out of his message.
>
>First was the wording of the type of covering allowed.It turns out that
>microfilm is not permitted,any Mylar is.
>
>Second there is a minimum weight, 1.970 grams.I guess I'm balasting up!
>
>Next was the prop. The blades must maintain a constant thickness of.032 in.
>However of course they are to be warped with a helix of your favorite method.
>
>All dimensions and specs must be followed, including use of a single thrust
>bearing.
>
>Imagine a mass launch of this at USIC....Wacky
>
>--- In , "ykleetx" <ykleetx_at_...> wrote:
>>
>> Hey, when did you guys receive your INAV issue? I haven't received mine.
>>
>> --- In Indoor_Construction_at_yahoogroups.com, "Mark F1diddler" <f1diddler_at_>
>>wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > To those who have received the latest INAV, what do you think of Abram Van
>>Dover's event proposal? He's instituting a one-design original 1960 Wally
>>Miller "Easy-B" contest. $100 first place prize! (And cash down to 3rd
>>place.) He stresses the only design exception is covering--no microfilm
>>allowed, as the 1960 Easy-B was mic covered.
>> >
>> > I wonder about the single hole prop hanger--wonder if there's a workaround
>>for that.
>> > MB
>> >
>>
>
>
>
Received on Mon Sep 27 2010 - 13:12:35 CEST
This archive was generated by Yannick on Sat Dec 14 2019 - 19:13:46 CET