Re: Initial vote on rules proposals

From: jabiruchick <jabiruchick_at_yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 18 May 2010 15:42:25 -0000

Good call on getting rid of 505-- it's hard enough to build a light Peanut to FAC rules, where you don't have to worry about scale rib spacing & other such sillyness! The competition will be more meaningful when 6 fliers battle it out for one event, rather than 3 in AMA Peanut and 3 in FAC. (and hopefully many more than that...)

And the A6 rules look great to me as well, as a modeler with FF scale experience but no "duration" experience-- paper and solid motor sticks are much less intimidating than plastic covering, rolled motor sticks, boron, VP props, etc etc. Keeping A6 basic keeps the door open for more people.

Thanks!
Katie

--- In Indoor_Construction_at_yahoogroups.com, "Don DeLoach" <ddeloach@...> wrote:
>
> Kudos to the ICB for getting all the votes RIGHT.
>
>
>
> I am really looking forward to seeing F1M and A-6 as rulebook,
> record-eligible events.
>
>
>
> Don DeLoach
>
> Editor, NFFS Free Flight Digest
>
>
>
> _____
>
> From: Indoor_Construction_at_yahoogroups.com
> [mailto:Indoor_Construction_at_yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of olbill61
> Sent: Monday, May 17, 2010 2:39 PM
> To: Indoor_Construction_at_yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [Indoor_Construction] Initial vote on rules proposals
>
>
>
>
>
> For any one who hasn't seen the initial vote results here they are:
>
> IFF 11-1 Fail
> IFF 11-2 Fail
> IFF 11-3 Pass
> IFF 11-4 Pass
> IFF 11-5 Pass
>
> If you don't know what any of this means, the proposals can be found here:
>
> http://www.modelaircraft.org/events/ruleproposals/indoorff.aspx
>
Received on Tue May 18 2010 - 08:43:26 CEST

This archive was generated by Yannick on Sat Dec 14 2019 - 19:13:46 CET