Re: Re: Brainbuster A-6 Rules

From: Fred or Judy Rash <frash_at_chartertn.net>
Date: Sat, 13 Feb 2010 13:02:52 -0500

The committee rules seem great, but there was no easy and responsive mechanism at that time to make them official.

Fred Rash


From: Mark F1diddler
Sent: Saturday, February 13, 2010 12:48 PM
To: Indoor_Construction_at_yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Indoor_Construction] Re: Brainbuster A-6 Rules


  


--- In Indoor_Construction_at_yahoogroups.com, "Don DeLoach" <ddeloach_at_...> wrote:
>
> Carl
>
> The 1/32" max prop shaft diameter has been universally ignored for years.
>
> For the current "A-6 Committee" rules look in the files section of
> Indoor_Construction.
>
> Don D

Yet those rules have conceivably never been used, at least in sizeable contests, esp. considering rule 1, the processing requirement.
MB






--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 8.5.435 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/2685 - Release Date: 02/13/10 08:43:00
Received on Sat Feb 13 2010 - 10:02:57 CET