RE: Re: BOM

From: Don DeLoach <ddeloach_at_comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2010 09:37:28 -0700

Your don't understand it correctly. The Pro-am is a separate event.

 

Don

 

  _____

From: Indoor_Construction_at_yahoogroups.com
[mailto:Indoor_Construction_at_yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Mark F1diddler
Sent: Thursday, February 11, 2010 7:23 AM
To: Indoor_Construction_at_yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Indoor_Construction] Re: BOM

 

  



--- In Indoor_Construction <mailto:Indoor_Construction%40yahoogroups.com>
_at_yahoogroups.com, "Don DeLoach" <ddeloach_at_...> wrote:
d> It will be interesting to see how the no BOM LPP event goes at J.C. this
> year. Hopefully it will bring some guys out of the woodwork.
>
> Don D.

The Rodemsky Pro-Am, if I understand correctly, is one specific matching of
a pro-built model with a specific "Am" for one contest.
The only other use for the model I can imagine (post Pro-AM) is for the AM
to practice fly, or conceivably pass on to another "Am" in some future
Pro-Am.

Not the same as a no-BOM event. Maybe for those who suppose BOM is wrecking
indoor, it's still an exciting first step.
MB
Received on Thu Feb 11 2010 - 08:39:06 CET

This archive was generated by Yannick on Sat Dec 14 2019 - 19:13:46 CET