Re: A6 to become new AMA event ?

From: Mark F1diddler <f1diddler_at_yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 31 Jan 2010 16:32:08 -0000

--- In Indoor_Construction_at_yahoogroups.com, "Bill Gowen" <wdgowen@...> wrote:

<< The problem is that my current model is designed per the rules that I thought WERE the consensus.>>

There's a consensus? I thought the point of the 2006 A6 Committe was to try to find a "working consensus" of A6 advocates, and to afterward try to parlay such consensus into a more widespread exposure and acceptance. The first part (volunteer stakeholker's consensus) did happen, the second part did not, maybe due to apathy of rest of the indoor community, maybe due to failure to personally approach contest CDs, and put the rules in their hands, or maybe due to ongoing territorialism. If there really was a perceived, working consensus, what would embolden someone to impose a brand new 50% tail area limit?
 
<< Don has already submitted a change to eliminate foam from the materials allowed.>>

Oh, ya mean per the consensus of the 2006 A6 Committee? Hokay...
Mark B
Received on Sun Jan 31 2010 - 08:32:28 CET