Re: A6 rules proposal

From: leop12345 <leop_at_lyradev.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2010 02:43:35 -0000

I agree with Bill Gowen. Since the Indoor_construction group is said to have helped decide the no-film rule, I vote to amend the A6 rules to allow film in addition to the other coverings. I do not think we should be slaves to what might very well be an incorrect perception by newcomers. I think A6 with film will be easier to build than with paper covering.

Leo

Bloomington IN

--- In Indoor_Construction_at_yahoogroups.com, Warthodson@... wrote:
>
>
> Don,
> What version of the A-6 rules did you submit?
> Bill,
> The topic of allowing plastic coverings has been discussed numerous times on various forums. While there may be some advantges to plastic, I remain against allowing it, simply because it is preceived by many newcomers to be more difficult than tissue covering. And A-6 is an entry level duration event. Also, A-6 is one of the more popular events at local indoor events and at the USIC. I suggest that it is working well as it is & should be left that way.
> Gary
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bill Gowen <wdgowen_at_...>
> To: Indoor_Construction_at_yahoogroups.com; freeflightml_at_yahoogroups.com
> Cc: Indoor_Construction_at_yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Wed, Jan 27, 2010 10:56 pm
> Subject: [Indoor_Construction] Re: A6 rules proposal
>
>
>
>
>
> I have proposed at a couple of times that the "official" rules of this unofficial event be changed to allow Mylar. The original idea of A-6 was to have an event that was an "easy" event and everyone knew that working with plastic film was much more difficult than paper. I think if you will ask anyone who flies A-6 about whether paper covering makes the event "easier" you will get the choice of "no" or "no" with some modifiers in front of it.
>
> If there is a chance that A-6 will get into the AMA rule book then I think that we should make sure that the prohibition of plastic covering dies with the event's unofficial status.
>
> Don, would you consider amending your proposal to eliminate rule #9? I will support your proposal in either case.
>
> Bill Gowen
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Ken Achée
> To: freeflightml_at_yahoogroups.com
> Cc: Indoor_Construction_at_yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Wednesday, January 27, 2010 10:30 PM
> Subject: [Indoor_Construction] RE: [freeflightml] turbulators
>
>
>
>
>
> Since Ultra Film doesn’t change trim with changes in relative humidity as condenser paper does and since this novice finds Ultra Film easier to work with than condenser paper, is their any chance of getting the condenser paper requirement removed from the A-6 rules when the indoor board votes?
>
> Ken in soggy South Alabama.
>
>
> From: freeflightml_at_yahoogroups.com [mailto:freeflightml_at_yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Don DeLoach
> Sent: Wednesday, January 27, 2010 9:10 PM
> To: freeflightml_at_yahoogroups.com
> Subject: RE: [freeflightml] turbulators
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Gary
> On a related subject I have submitted A-6 as an official AMA event for 2011. Hopefully the indoor board will vote to allow it in.
>
> Thermix
> Don D.
>
>
>
>
> From: freeflightml_at_yahoogroups.com [mailto:freeflightml_at_yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Warthodson@...
> Sent: Wednesday, January 27, 2010 5:41 PM
> To: freeflightml_at_yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: [freeflightml] turbulators
>
>
>
>
>
> Sergio,
>
> Thanks for the very clear explaination. It all makes sense & I am beginning to think experimenting with turbulators in this application may be a waste of time.
> The A6 rules require a minimum 1/16" square leading & trailing edge. I have tried rotating the square leading edge 45 degrees from that shown in your diagram. This gives a more streamlined leading edge but I cannot say if it is better or worse. I guess I could also build a tapered leading edge as long as it was large enough to contain a 1/16" square.
>
> Gary Hodson
>
Received on Thu Jan 28 2010 - 18:44:03 CET

This archive was generated by Yannick on Sat Dec 14 2019 - 19:13:45 CET