RE: Re: question for Don S.; weight vs air loads

From: hermann andresen <hermanna_at_hotmail.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 08:09:53 +0000

Mark,

You're right. Balsa not the best for strain gaging and current telemetry a bit weighty for indoor, BUT a couple of thin sticks from LE & TE parallel to wing posts and maybe 1/16 gap on each side, should be worth many opinions.

Change in gap should be observable in flite and could even be recorded along w/other info with a multitude of digital cameras.

Static tests would be tricky, but some clever sportsman pointed out that the TE post takes the vast majority of the tork, could probably just let prop unwind while holding TE.

Could also save a bit of drag/wt with a Boron pointer behind post but it would be harder to read.

Strain gages work so good on real airplanes.
                                                                             
Good luck,
                   H





To: Indoor_Construction_at_yahoogroups.com
From: f1diddler_at_yahoo.com
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 23:44:29 +0000
Subject: [Indoor_Construction] Re: question for Don S.; weight vs air loads















 




    
                  --- In Indoor_Construction_at_yahoogroups.com, hermann andresen <hermanna_at_...> wrote:



> "To measure is to know." Lord Rayliegh

>

> Try some strain gages.



Herm,

How would you do that in flight, on an indoor weight FF?

MB



"To measure is to want more tools."

Mark F1diddler





 

      

    
    
        
        
        
        


        


        
        
_________________________________________________________________
HotmailŪ is up to 70% faster. Now good news travels really fast.
http://windowslive.com/online/hotmail?ocid=PID23391::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-US:WM_HYGN_faster:082009
Received on Fri Aug 21 2009 - 01:11:20 CEST

This archive was generated by Yannick on Sat Dec 14 2019 - 19:13:45 CET