Re: No-Cal performance data follow-up

From: LeRoy C Cordes <lcordes_at_juno.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 09:49:21 -0500

Thanks, John.

On Mon, 9 Mar 2009 21:23:34 -0000 "John Barker"
<john.barker783_at_ntlworld.com> writes:
LeRoy
If you want a quick, and usually a pretty accurate, idea of the rubber
width try multiplying the grams/inch figure for the rubber by 1.5.
Taking the first motor mentioned in Gary’s post which was a 14.75” long
loop weighing 0.8 gram; the rubber length is 29.5” so divide 0.8 by 29.5
which gives 0.0271 gram/inch, multiply this by 1.5 and it gives a rubber
width of just under 0.041 inches.
John







LeRoy Cordes
AMA 16974
Chicago, IL
In God We Trust
____________________________________________________________
Looking for insurance? Compare and save today. Click here.
http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL2141/fc/BLSrjpTInoKaAU48E1qYIWfbcq97IqhU8mVT9IHhFqbiHCvNuVrVZNYEL7K/



Received on Thu Mar 12 2009 - 07:06:43 CET

This archive was generated by Yannick on Sat Dec 14 2019 - 19:13:45 CET