Re: Re: Rubber? .... Still a Taboo Subject !??

From: Bill Gowen <b.gowen_at_comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2009 19:51:08 -0500

If I can infer from the below that your tests show 5/99 is 10% better than 3/02 then I think you got hold of a really bad batch of 3/02.

  ----- Original Message -----
  From: tomv136
  To: Indoor_Construction_at_yahoogroups.com
  Sent: Wednesday, March 04, 2009 6:41 PM
  Subject: [Indoor_Construction] Re: Rubber? .... Still a Taboo Subject !??


  --- In Indoor_Construction_at_yahoogroups.com, "Mark" <f1diddler_at_...> wrote:
>
> --- In Indoor_Construction_at_yahoogroups.com, "Mark" <f1diddler_at_> wrote:
>
>
> <<Of course they are at a disadvantage, but more so for being a newcomer than for
> having rubber that gives 5% less energy than someone with the best Tan II.>>
>
>
> Or the margin may well be 10% if talking about any ol' Super Sport batch. Even so....
> Mark F1diddler
>
  I fly F1B and test all my motors. I have 2/99, 3/99, 3/02, 10/97 and 5/99 rubber. Only the 5/99 rubber is better than the last batch of super sport I've tested (6/06). The difference is about 10% as Marc estimated.


  


------------------------------------------------------------------------------



  No virus found in this incoming message.
  Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
  Version: 8.0.237 / Virus Database: 270.11.7/1983 - Release Date: 03/04/09 07:41:00
Received on Wed Mar 04 2009 - 16:51:13 CET