Good questions, Gary - I'll be watching for the answers too.
LeRoy Cordes
AMA 16974
Chicago, IL
In God We Trust
On Thu, 27 Nov 2008 09:15:48 EST Warthodson_at_aol.com writes:
From: Warthodson
To: Indoor_Construction_at_yahoogroups.com
Sent: 11/26/2008 9:54:31 A.M. Central Standard Time
Subj: low ceiling high duration
I am interested in hearing what strategies seem to work for increasing
duration in cluttered low ceiling sites. Particularly sites where it is
not practical to spend much time "scrubbing" because of the clutter &
high likelyhood of getting hung up. Assume making the airplane (less
rubber) lighter is not an option.
Are airfoils with greater camber of any help? Would you agree that for
high ceiling sites, cambers seem to be 3% to 5%? How about low ceilings?
In categories with no limit on rubber weight what seems to be better:
Low pitch props & thin rubber or higher pitches & thicker rubber, or some
other combination? I.E. How do you optimize the "area under the curve" of
the rubber when you are limited to a low ceiling & minimal scrubbing?
Thanks,
Gary
Life should be easier. So should your homepage. Try the NEW AOL.com.
Life should be easier. So should your homepage. Try the NEW AOL.com.
LeRoy Cordes
AMA 16974
Chicago, IL
In God We Trust
____________________________________________________________
Are You Single?
Come see the hottest online dating site in the UK! Click Here!
http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL2141/fc/u4MuScMulX4yQonIcrytDXz6kvFXMjrS0hjURvI5piZuFwX63bFUH/
Received on Thu Nov 27 2008 - 10:47:49 CET