Re: propellor and rubber of a F1D model

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

From: kevin_f1m <kevin1990__at_hotmail.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 17:35:24 -0000

> That might indicate that the actual effective pitch is much higher
than

that was also my thought.
Received on Mon Mar 10 2008 - 10:35:26 CET

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: kevin_f1m: "Re: propellor and rubber of a F1D model"
Previous message: John Barker: "RE: Re: propellor and rubber of a F1D model"
In reply to: John Kagan: "Re: propellor and rubber of a F1D model"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by Yannick on Sat Dec 14 2019 - 19:13:45 CET