Re: F1D longitudinal stability

From: Tapio Linkosalo <tapio.linkosalo_at_helsinki.fi>
Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2007 15:58:30 +0200 (EET)

On Fri, 7 Dec 2007 RLBailey_at_care4free.net wrote:

> Unless your F1D has an enormous tailplane, the CG is still much too far
> ...
> Try CG at 85 -90%.

Yeah, thought so. Especially, as Big Square (the only drawing that I saw
refer to a spesific CG location) claims 2" in front of the TE - that is
75%! I just wonder how this will affect the incidence, and how much is too
much? 3.4 degrees sounds quite good, but will it increase much if I move
the CG forward?



-Tapio-
Received on Fri Dec 07 2007 - 05:58:34 CET