Re: Re: SO Wright Stuff

From: <vhacker_at_pol.net>
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 21:41:25 -0500 (EST)

Canine It might also help top have your Zip code Hack

> I am in Phoenix, AZ, I would like a mentor. Thank you for all the
> suggestions.
>
> On 2/21/07, vhacker_at_pol.net <vhacker_at_pol.net> wrote:
>>
>> If you were to tell me where you are I might be able to help Suburbs
>> dDO
>> NOT COUNT Give big city areas Hack
>>
>> > Hi, I am also a High School student doing SO. I am currently working
>> on the wright stuff too. I am also using Ray Harlan's Cruiser 67. I
>> am dealing with the same problem as Jim. I didn't buy a prop gauge,
>> but I built one myself. It's really confusing. I have no idea how to
>> work it. I am working by myself with my coach, but he doesn't know
>> much about the plane either.
>> >
>> > -- In
>> Indoor_Construction_at_yahoogroups.com<Indoor_Construction%40yahoogroups.com>,
>> <vhacker_at_...> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> If you were to tell us wwhere yu live WE?ME might be able to find
>> > yu a
>> >> menter. Doc Hacker Vhacker_at_... Hack
>> >>
>> >> > Hi, I am a high school student. I have a Harlan Cruiser 67 and I
>> > cannot
>> >> > get it to climb up to the ceiling. I hear people talking about
>> > hitting
>> >> > the ceiling and falling, but my plane will only go up like 6 or 7
>> > feet
>> >> > and start descending. The width of the rubber band is whatever
>> > came in
>> >> > the kit, and the pitch is as it is for I don't know how to change
>> > it
>> >> > without breaking it (I broke 2 of my extras so far). I change the
>> > pitch
>> >> > by twisting it in the center, but it never works. The plane has a
>> >> positive angle of attack. I wish I can see it go up and hit the
>> > ceiling
>> >> > because the plane isn't that impressive when it isn't flying
>> > high. The
>> >> > propeller is not spinning fast enough, i think that is why. What
>> > shocks
>> >> > me the most is that I put more 100 turns with the 15:1 winder and
>> > close
>> >> > to 200, and it went only 6, 7 feet. The best time I had was 34
>> > seconds.
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Received on Wed Feb 21 2007 - 18:46:46 CET

This archive was generated by Yannick on Sat Dec 14 2019 - 19:13:44 CET