Re: Re: EZB

From: Fred Tellier <fred-tellier_at_cogeco.ca>
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 12:58:13 -0500

Events have a way of killing themselves when people lose interest, changing the rules often makes the demise sooner. If EZ B becomes unpopular due to its difficulty we already have a heavy event F1L. Why create another.

Fred Tellier
  ----- Original Message -----
  From: Mark
  To: Indoor_Construction_at_yahoogroups.com
  Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2007 10:04 AM
  Subject: [Indoor_Construction] Re: EZB


  --- In Indoor_Construction_at_yahoogroups.com, "jim buxton"
  <glider902003_at_...> wrote:
  d>
> Make sure you get Max Zaluska in on this (I am pretty sure he is not
  on
> this list), Jim Richmond and Don S. All of them seem to be big
> supporters of the light EZB style model.

  Jim,
  Max and Don S weighed in over on Indoornews.com.

  I think everyone should just (continue) to state their personal
  preference--what each of us would want to actually build for actual
  competition. Taken together, that should be a better indicator
  of "what best for the future of indoor" than to try to analyze what
  *would" be best for everyone else collectively, IMO.
  Mark B



   

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Received on Wed Feb 14 2007 - 10:08:45 CET

This archive was generated by Yannick on Sat Dec 14 2019 - 19:13:44 CET