Re: EZB

From: Nicholas <ndhuang83706_at_gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 00:06:58 -0000

I would like add a hearty second to Mr. Gowen's opinion. I know that
I can't make an EZB at less than 1 g, but I want the challenge to be
available when I'm ready.
Nicholas Huang
Boise, ID

--- In Indoor_Construction_at_yahoogroups.com, "Bill Gowen" <b.gowen@...>
wrote:
>
> I don't agree. I can't build an EZB to a competitive weight but I'd
hate to see the event go away or get diluted. I think there needs to
be events that are sufficiently difficult to challenge the fliers who
are up to that kind of challenge.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: kibbie_dome
> To: Indoor_Construction_at_yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Monday, February 12, 2007 6:46 PM
> Subject: [Indoor_Construction] EZB
>
>
> EZB rules change
>
> Wally Miller and I think that the current AMA EZB event is headed for
> the indoor grave yard unless one change is made in the rules. The
> numbers for F1L fliers has been increasing while EZB has been on the
> decline for a number of years. This is primarily due to the fact that
> a lot of guys are not keeping up with the current trend of light .3
> to .5gram models. There are probably a lot of .7 to .8 gram models
> stored away in model boxes and we would like to see them compete
> again. We would like to see the current EZB rule changed from an
> unlimited weight to one of either .7, .75 or .8 gram. We are throwing
> this out for the indoor community to discuss and will follow the lead
> of what the majority of the fliers want in the regards of minimum
> weight.
> L Coslick
>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Received on Tue Feb 13 2007 - 16:07:03 CET

This archive was generated by Yannick on Sat Dec 14 2019 - 19:13:44 CET