Re: Re: AMA indoor beginners class

From: Bill Gowen <b.gowen_at_earthlink.net>
Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2006 08:54:58 -0400

Ignacio
This is the whole point of competition to me. I want to test myself against the best competition I can find.

F1L is an excellent event for beginners in my opinion. You have to learn pretty good building and trimming techniques to do well but you can build flyable models early in your indoor career. They are a little fussier than LPP but fly slower and longer and are more what an indoor endurance model is supposed to be than LPP.


  ----- Original Message -----
  From: izgo
  To: Indoor_Construction_at_yahoogroups.com
  Sent: Sunday, June 11, 2006 11:07 PM
  Subject: [Indoor_Construction] Re: AMA indoor beginners class


  You are right

  And well, the only reason I culd ever take part in a mini-van race is
  if among the competitors I find Micheal Schumacher ( or Mario
  Andretti, Richard Petty, etc). If not, there is no incentivation to
  race. :)

  --- In Indoor_Construction_at_yahoogroups.com, "Jeff Anderson"
  <janderson_at_...> wrote:
>
> I think you guys have it backwards on this beginner thing.
>
> Its you vs Micheal Schumacher (Mario Andretti, Richard Petty, etc)
  in matching mini-vans, who wins?
>
> There's no way to keep the experts from winning any class they enter
  with construction rules. The best you can hope for is to keep the
  effort to enter low enough not to frighten away beginners.
>
> Jeff Anderson
> Livonia, MI
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Mark
> To: Indoor_Construction_at_yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Sunday, June 11, 2006 6:01 AM
> Subject: [Indoor_Construction] Re: AMA indoor beginners class
>
>
> --- In Indoor_Construction_at_yahoogroups.com, "izgo" <izgo@> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > If you start driving a Formula 1 car you will crash, be sure :)
>
> Maybe so, but no need to start out with a bicycle when most guys
  can at
> least drive the General Lee.
>
> .
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>



   

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Received on Mon Jun 12 2006 - 17:16:37 CEST