On Feb 19, 2006, at 12:17 PM, Mark wrote:
> --- In Indoor_Construction_at_yahoogroups.com, Chris and Josette Borland
> <candjborland_at_...> wrote:
> d> Thanks Bill,
> >
> > I didn't want to want to get walked all over by Mark for
> bringing
> > up the subject of legality. >
>
> Chris,
> Groupwise, it's fine for a modeler (you) to help another modeler
> understand an ALREADY accepted rule, or an already accepted
> interpretation of a rule. A couple of you have told me this is
> inconsistent with the "No Rules Debate" OT policy. But I see a big
> difference between normal everyday clarification, and a debate.
>
Hi Mark,
Thanks for the clarification of what is "proper" on this site. On the
subject of power trips, so what?, as long as they are not abused too
much. After all, usually somebody has gone to a lot of work to do
things their way and maybe nobody else has done anything at all.
After belonging to many different types of organizations, I've
decided the real issue is -- if you don't like it, are you ready to
do it all yourself? It's amazing how this basic and simple concept
clears out the dissenters!
Chris Borland - Sacramento
Received on Sun Feb 19 2006 - 15:50:53 CET
This archive was generated by Yannick on Sat Dec 14 2019 - 19:13:44 CET