clarification: rules debates

From: Mark <f1diddler_at_yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2006 00:35:54 -0000

--- In Indoor_Construction_at_yahoogroups.com, Don Slusarczyk
<don5490_at_s...> wrote:
>
> Mark,
>
> Since you posted here I will answer here.>>


Aah, *now* I see what you were considering. A fudge factor discussion
might be classified as a "rules debate" which is off-topic. Thanks for
caring. However, I have suggested to several in private that rules
summaries are FINE, even a long rules explanation that doesn't become a
debate is FINE. But rules *development* often acquires a tediousness
and/or political component which has interest usually to only the 2-5
people who fly the event in question.

For example, the A6 rules Yahoo Group is doing fine, with 9 members
jabbering on about the smallest A6 issues. I'm enjoying it, but doubt
if our other 93 members would! That's how it should be, IMO.
Mark F1diddler
Received on Mon Jan 23 2006 - 16:36:12 CET